TSTP Solution File: PUZ137^1 by Satallax---3.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Satallax---3.5
% Problem : PUZ137^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:26:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.11s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 29
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 8 unt; 4 typ; 1 def)
% Number of atoms : 73 ( 4 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 83 ( 22 ~; 16 |; 0 &; 24 @)
% ( 11 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 3 ( 3 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 19 ( 16 usr; 17 con; 0-2 aty)
% ( 3 !!; 0 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 1 ^ 5 !; 0 ?; 6 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_peter,type,
peter: $i ).
thf(ty_eigen__1,type,
eigen__1: $o ).
thf(ty_eigen__0,type,
eigen__0: $o ).
thf(ty_says,type,
says: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(h0,assumption,
! [X1: $o > $o,X2: $o] :
( ( X1 @ X2 )
=> ( X1 @ ( eps__0 @ X1 ) ) ),
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(eigendef_eigen__1,definition,
( eigen__1
= ( eps__0
@ ^ [X1: $o] :
~ ( ( says @ peter @ X1 )
=> ~ X1 ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[eigen__1])]) ).
thf(sP1,plain,
( sP1
<=> ( says @ peter
@ ! [X1: $o] :
( ( says @ peter @ X1 )
=> ~ X1 ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).
thf(sP2,plain,
( sP2
<=> ( says @ peter @ eigen__1 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).
thf(sP3,plain,
( sP3
<=> ( sP1
=> ~ ! [X1: $o] :
( ( says @ peter @ X1 )
=> ~ X1 ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).
thf(sP4,plain,
( sP4
<=> ! [X1: $o] :
( ( says @ peter @ X1 )
=> ~ X1 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).
thf(sP5,plain,
( sP5
<=> ( eigen__1 = eigen__0 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])]) ).
thf(sP6,plain,
( sP6
<=> eigen__1 ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])]) ).
thf(sP7,plain,
( sP7
<=> ( peter = peter ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])]) ).
thf(sP8,plain,
( sP8
<=> ( says @ peter @ eigen__0 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])]) ).
thf(sP9,plain,
( sP9
<=> eigen__0 ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])]) ).
thf(sP10,plain,
( sP10
<=> ( sP4 = sP9 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])]) ).
thf(sP11,plain,
( sP11
<=> ( sP2
=> ~ sP6 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])]) ).
thf(thm,conjecture,
!! @ ( says @ peter ) ).
thf(h1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( !! @ ( says @ peter ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]) ).
thf(h2,assumption,
~ sP8,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(1,plain,
( sP5
| ~ sP6
| ~ sP9 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(2,plain,
( ~ sP2
| sP8
| ~ sP7
| ~ sP5 ),
inference(mating_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(3,plain,
( sP11
| sP6 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(4,plain,
( sP11
| sP2 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(5,plain,
( sP4
| ~ sP11 ),
inference(eigen_choice_rule,[status(thm),assumptions([h0])],[h0,eigendef_eigen__1]) ).
thf(6,plain,
( ~ sP4
| sP3 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(7,plain,
( ~ sP3
| ~ sP1
| ~ sP4 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(8,plain,
( sP10
| sP4
| sP9 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(9,plain,
sP7,
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(10,plain,
( ~ sP1
| sP8
| ~ sP7
| ~ sP10 ),
inference(mating_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(ax1,axiom,
sP1 ).
thf(11,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,ax1,h2]) ).
thf(12,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h2]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h1,11,h2]) ).
thf(13,plain,
$false,
inference(eigenvar_choice,[status(thm),assumptions([h1]),eigenvar_choice(discharge,[h0])],[12,h0]) ).
thf(0,theorem,
!! @ ( says @ peter ),
inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h1])],[12,h1]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : PUZ137^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sat May 28 21:27:38 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.35 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.35 % Mode: mode213
% 0.11/0.35 % Inferences: 46
% 0.11/0.35 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------